2019 is shaping up to be a pivotal moment for the virtual reality (VR) hardware industry. All the major players are releasing new headsets that push the limits of what these devices are capable of, but it also seems like no one can decide which aspects of the VR headset?design most need improvement. Some companies are going for easy to use, affordable devices. Some are pushing the boundaries with new input options and high refresh rate displays. HP is firmly in the camp that believes higher resolution is the key to the best VR headset.
I've spent the past week with the HP Reverb VR headset, and I am left somewhat conflicted. On one hand, it produces an incredible visual experience and is comfortable. However, the hand tracking is atrocious and really puts a damper on the whole experience.
HP Reverb VR Headset Specs
|Screen||Dual 2.89-inch LCD panels with Pulse Backlight technology|
|Resolution||2160 x 2160 per eye (4320 x 2160 combined)|
|Subpixel Rendering||RGB sub-pixels|
|Refresh Rate||90 Hz with recommended system specs|
|Field of View||~114-degrees, Fresnel-Aspherical|
|Tracking||2x front-facing cameras|
|Sensors||Windows Mixed Reality inside/out, 6-DOF motion tracking, gyroscope, accelerometer, magnetometer|
|Eye adjustments||63mm +/- 8mm by software control|
|Connections||DisplayPort 1.3, USB 3.0, stereo 3.5 mm headphone/mic jack|
|Cables||3.5m 2-in-1 (DisplayPort 1.3 and USB 3.0) cable|
Full-size DisplayPort to mini DisplayPort adapter
|Face Cushion||Replaceable, cloth-covered foam|
|Dimensions (without straps)||2.17 x 6.97 x 3.31 inches / 55 x 177 x 84mm|
|Weight (without cable)||1.1 pounds / 498g|
|Price||$599 (consumer version)?|
At first glance, HP's Reverb headset is a very nice-looking device with a sleek exterior made of smooth black plastic contrasted with dark gray fabric material on the front and rear of the headset. It features a 3-point head strap that resembles the one found on the original?Oculus Rift. The side straps are mounted to the headset with a rigid plastic structure that includes a hinge to let you the rotate the position of the straps.
Above the left hinge is a cut-out for the tether cable and audio jack lead. Like?HP's first Windows Mixed Reality (MR) headset, the Reverb features a detachable tether cable. Unlike its predecessor, the Reverb's cable attachment includes a?latch to secure it in place. The new cable is a different shape, so you can't use the cable from the old HP headset on the new device or vice versa.
The first-generation Windows MR headsets used HDMI cables, but the resolution of the Reverb exceeds the specifications of the HDMI ports found on most?graphics cards, so it has a DisplayPort interface.
HP also includes a DisplayPort to mini DisplayPort adapter with the Reverb headset, which is a nice touch for?laptop?owners. Although, you would need a powerful laptop, as the minimum specifications for the Reverb are a significant step beyond most headsets. You need a computer with at least a GTX 1080?or?RX Vega 64?graphics card to power the headset.
Ultra-High Resolution, Wider and Shorter FOV
The graphics card requirements for the Reverb headset are so high because the Reverb offers a much higher resolution than almost any VR headset on the consumer market. The Reverb features dual 2.89-inch?LCDs, each with 2160 x 2160 resolution, which is a significant increase from the 1440 x 1600 panels featured in the?HTC Vive Pro,?Samsung HMD Odyssey?and upcoming?Valve Index.
And it's a massive jump from first-gen VR headsets, like the Rift and?HTC Vive, which offer 1080 x 1200 per eye resolution. Incredibly, the combined horizontal resolution of the first-gen headsets is equal to the per-eye resolution of HP's Reverb. The Reverb's combined horizontal resolution is a staggering 4,320 pixels, which is more than that of a?4K display?(3840 pixels).
HP likes to highlight that the Reverb headset produces a broader?field of view (FOV)?than competing headsets. I didn’t notice the difference when I first donned the Reverb, but when I jumped from the Reverb to the Vive Pro for the benchmark tests, the extra few degrees of vision were much more evident. It is by no means a game changer, but the wider view is a welcomed touch.
HP used square displays instead of inverted rectangular displays, which results in a reduction in vertical FOV compared to most headsets. I would love to tell you that the display height doesn't make a difference, but it did impact the experience. My view into the virtual world was cut off below my nose, which triggered a strange sensation that reduced my level of immersion while gaming. It almost looked like I was wearing a breathing mask over my mouth and nose. To someone new to VR, however, this would probably wouldn't be so apparent.?
Impressive Image Clarity
HP's Reverb produces excellent image quality. I've never been able to read text so clearly in VR before. I first noticed just how clear and crisp the display was when I launched Serious Sam VR: The Last Hope and saw how well I could read the menus.
With the Rift and the Vive, the menus in Serious Sam VR are legible but noticeably blurry with prominent godray distortion, which is only mildly improved in the Vive Pro. With the Reverb, godrays weren't a problem, and the edges of each character on the menu were sharp.
I didn't catch a glimpse of screen door effect. The Reverb's LCD panels are not only high-resolution but also feature full RGB sub-pixel arrays, like the?Sony PSVR, to help produce lifelike colors. The LCD panel also uses a stripe array, which means the sub-pixels are aligned in rows rather than the checkerboard pattern of PenTile displays found in OLED headsets, like the Rift and Vive Pro .
Acceptable Black Levels
A lot of people complain about LCD panels used in head-mounted displays (HMDs) because they can't produce the same vivid black levels that AMOLED panels can. However, low-persistence and RGB sub-pixels do far more to improve the VR experience than deeper blacks ever could.
The Reverb's display panels include Pulse Backlight technology, which is supposed to improve the LCD panels' black levels. I don’t know how much difference the Pulse Backlight actually makes, but I can tell you the black levels in the Reverb compare very well to the Vive Pro’s AMOLED display.
Copycat Head Strap Design
It looks like HP tried to replicate the springy mechanism of the Rift's side straps, which allows you to pull the headset off without loosening the Velcro that holds it secure. Unfortunately, the springs are shorter than I would like. I ended up setting the straps looser than I preferred so that I could slip it off without undoing the strap.
The top strap is a thin Velcro strip made of a rigid material, like a tie strap you would find on camping equipment. It attaches to the visor with a plastic bracket that makes it difficult to adjust the length of the top strap.
No Flip Visor
Curiously, HP deleted one of the best features from its first Windows MR headset. The Reverb doesn't include a flip visor, which means you need to take it off your head if you want to grab a sip of your drink or talk to someone who just walked into the room.
You can flip it up slightly, but not enough to clear the proximity sensor that tells the MR Portal to give you mouse and?keyboard?access on the desktop.
Removable Face Cushion
The consumer version of the Reverb comes with a washable fabric face cushion. It's soft and breathable but still seems like it will absorb sweat like a sponge. The professional version of the headset has a washable leather face cushion, a superior option that I think everyone should've received.?
The fabric cushion attaches to the headset with a pair of Velcro tabs, and the fabric slips under a lip on each lens in a similar fashion to the?Oculus Go?headset. It's easy to remove the cushion if you need to replace it. Hopefully, HP will make alternative accessories available in the future.
Cheap Feeling Headphones
The Reverb's head strap is an upgrade compared to most of the Windows MR headsets, but integrated audio is arguably more important. In the first generation, Samsung was the only Windows MR partner vendor that included headphones with its headset. This time around, HP bundled everything into one package. But the headphones on the Reverb headset aren't going to win any awards.
They produce excellent clean audio but feel inferior. The adjustment hinges are flimsy and seem like they won't stand the test of time. One of the hinges on my review unit is already wearing out. The left speaker makes a loud snap when I pull it away from my ear, but the right hinge barely makes any noise and feels like the locking mechanism is already loose. I suspect that the tab that holds the headphones in the open position will wear out sooner than later.
Nevertheless, the integrated headphones are a wonderful addition, simply thanks to the convenience of not needing multiple devices to enjoy VR. They're removable, and the headset also includes a 3.5mm jack, in case you wish to use a better pair of headphones.
The Reverb includes two built-in microphones to enable voice recognition for use with?Cortana?right out of the box. There's a lot to be said about having every necessary component in a single package.
Speaking of which, the Reverb also includes a feature that should have been part of every Windows MR headset.
No More Bluetooth Dongles
Microsoft's Windows MR controllers must be paired to your computer via Bluetooth, which is probably my biggest pet peeve about the first-generation MR headsets. It wouldn't cost much to include a Bluetooth radio—even a USB dongle—with the headset bundle, but none of the MR vendors bothered to do that. HP, however, must have picked up on the complaints because this time around the company included a built-in Bluetooth receiver.
Strangely, when I was pairing the headset with my PC, Microsoft's scan process said that my computer didn't include a Bluetooth radio. Fortunately, the controllers connected anyway. And to my surprise, the controllers came out of the box pre-paired to the headset. My computer detected them as soon as I powered them on.
Not These Wands Again!
It's clear to see that HP put effort into building the Reverb headset, and the result is unquestionably the best MR headset available today. Unfortunately, that doesn't matter because HP's neglected to update the controllers, and these controllers honestly ruin the entire experience. I'm more than a little bit disappointed.
Last year, I complained about Microsoft's terrible, unergonomic, flimsy controllers. I couldn't believe that all the MR partners, save for Samsung, used Microsoft's reference design. As a first-generation design, they weren't the worst thing in the world, but they weren't good either. Now, a year and a half later, HP continues to use the original controller design, and that's just bad.
Put bluntly: these controllers aren't acceptable in today's VR market. Even just a few subtle changes (like the ones Samsung made) could have made a significant difference.
MORE:?Virtual Reality Basics